Primetime
The review
A24's *Primetime* is Lance Oppenheim's narrative feature debut — and it announces a filmmaker with a genuinely singular eye. Critics are nearly unanimous that Robert Pattinson's lead performance is the film's engine: a transformation so complete it drew immediate awards talk out of Venice, playing a television host whose on-camera righteousness and off-camera ambition have stopped resembling each other. Around him sits an ensemble critics keep singling out beyond the star — a quietly superb supporting turn from Merritt Wever, a breakout performance from Skyler Gisondo that several reviewers call the film's moral center, and a strikingly assured first acting role for musician Phoebe Bridgers.
The film's most defining trait is its look and attack. Shot with deliberately saturated, almost pastel 2000s-broadcast colors across multiple formats, it has the texture of an arthouse horror movie wearing a network-TV smile — critics describe a work of operatic, almost physical aggression that rails against the hypocrisies of mid-2000s tabloid television. Reviewers agree on the craft and the audacity even when they split on the result: the same stylistic maximalism some find exhilarating and darkly funny, others find exhausting.
That split is real, and it's about approach rather than quality of execution. Most critics' reservations concern tone and construction rather than the performances — the drama is accused of contrivance by some, and the frenetic editing and relentless stylization leave a portion of viewers (including some general audiences) feeling flattened or disoriented rather than gripped. The film is not a sober investigative drama about its true story; it's a lurid, thesis-driven portrait of ambition, complicity and the line between justice and spectacle, and critics broadly agree it should be approached on those terms.
Who it's for
Viewers who like confrontational, style-forward cinema in the A24 register — arthouse thrillers that weaponize their aesthetics (fans of films like *Nightcrawler* or *The Apprentice* will recognize the media-morality-play territory). Also for audiences interested in the *To Catch a Predator* era and the ethics of tabloid/entertainment "justice" journalism, and for anyone drawn to transformative lead performances.
Who it's not for
Anyone expecting a sober, journalistic docudrama faithful to the real events — this is deliberately exaggerated and stylized. Viewers sensitive to frantic editing, abrasive tone, or queasy subject matter will likely bounce; those who dislike films that prioritize provocation over clean storytelling should steer clear. Real-life principals' supporters will find the portrayal unflattering by design. — disturbing sexual material involving predation themes · graphic nudity · moderate violence · strong language · heavy/bleak themes
Birds of a feather...
- FilmNightcrawler (2014)






The clearest companion piece: both are portraits of media figures whose pursuit of footage/content consumes every ethical boundary, using stylized night-time aesthetics and frenetic packaging of human misery to implicate the systems (and audiences) that reward ruthlessness.
92% - FilmNetwork (1976)






The granddaddy of TV-news satire. Both films dissect how television transforms morality into product, with a figurehead whose public persona becomes a ratings asset, and both use heightened, artificial style to make the critique itself feel like spectacle.
88% - TVThe Boys (2019)






Shares the corrosive satire of performative morality and media spectacle, using exaggerated, tonally jarring style to expose institutions that monetize public trust — though its superhero frame is more escapist and less focused on journalism specifically.
62% - FilmZodiac (2007)






Connects on the true-cr/media axis: both examine how the hunt for predators or killers becomes a cultural spectacle, with the media amplifying notoriety and obsession blurring the line between pursuit and complicity. Zodiac is colder and more procedural in texture.
58% - TVBarry (2018)






Both are darkly comic studies of public persona versus private rot, interrogating how performance and image-making sanitize monstrousness, and how the stories we tell about villains implicate the storytellers. Barry is a character study first, where Primetime is systemic satire.
55%





