Raging Bull
The review
Reviewers converge overwhelmingly on this as one of the towering achievements of American film, with Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic aggregates both landing in the high-80s to high-90s and critics from Roger Ebert onward repeatedly naming it the best film of its decade. The consensus centers on Robert De Niro's performance as boxer Jake LaMotta, praised as a total physical and psychological transformation rather than a conventional star turn, paired with Thelma Schoonmaker's editing of the fight sequences, which critics single out for turning the ring into something closer to expressionist nightmare than sports coverage. The black-and-white cinematography and sound design are consistently cited as elevating a boxing biopic into something closer to opera. Where critics diverge is not on craft but on comfort: a smaller but recurring strand of commentary finds the naturalistic, dialogue-driven stretches between fights slow going, and some reviewers flag that the film asks a lot of patience for a central figure who is given little in the way of conventional likability or redemption. That is best read as a minority reservation about approachability, not a real dispute about quality — even critics who find the pacing demanding still rank the filmmaking itself among the best of its era. Awards recognition (including wins for Best Actor and Best Film Editing, alongside multiple additional nominations) reinforced the near-unanimous critical view rather than complicating it.
Who it's for
Strong fit for viewers drawn to actor-driven character studies, craft-focused filmmaking (editing, sound, cinematography), and boxing or sports dramas that use the sport as a lens on something darker rather than an underdog triumph story. Also a natural pick for anyone working through Scorsese's or De Niro's filmography, or interested in landmark early-1980s American cinema. Likely to frustrate viewers looking for a conventional sports-movie arc with a rousing payoff, or anyone who wants a protagonist to root for in a straightforward way — the film deliberately withholds that comfort. Its slower, naturalistic midsection stretches may also test viewers expecting the film to be wall-to-wall with the intensity of its fight scenes.
Who it's not for
— graphic violence · domestic violence · disturbing imagery · strong language · brief sexual content
Birds of a feather...
- FilmTaxi Driver (1976)






Scorsese's other portrait of a violent, alienated man whose warped psychology the film refuses to fully explain or redeem, similarly denying audiences easy catharsis or a likable protagonist.
88% - FilmGoodfellas (1990)






Both are Scorsese studies of self-destructive men whose codes of loyalty and masculinity curdle into violence, using bravura formal style to render moral collapse rather than conventional catharsis.
80% - FilmAmerican History X (1998)






A brutally honest character study of a man whose violent self-destruction wrecks everyone around him. Both films use stylistic aggression and a nonlinear structure to explore how past trauma fuels present rage, and neither offers catharsis.
78% - FilmThe Searchers (1956)






Raging Bull mirrors The Searchers' portrait of masculinity curdled by jealousy and violence, refusing to resolve its protagonist's moral arc cleanly and asking audiences to sit with an unlikable, self-destructive man rather than a hero.
78% - FilmKokuho (2025)






Both are decades-spanning studies of men whose identity and worth become inseparable from a punishing, performance-based vocation, using stylized craft sequences to show the self most 'alive' inside the discipline that also consumes it.
78% - FilmReservoir Dogs (1992)






Both probe the self-destructive core of hyper-masculinity, where rage and jealousy are the only registers of feeling. The stylized violence and obsessive focus on male relationships echo Reservoir Dogs’ dissection of fragile egos.
75% - FilmApocalypse Now (1979)






Shares an interest in violence as ritual and spectacle and in a protagonist whose psychology resists tidy moral resolution, favoring mood and tragedy over catharsis.
58% - FilmVertigo (1958)






A formally rigorous psychological study of obsession and possessive desire that, like Raging Bull, refuses to grant its unstable protagonist clear catharsis or redemption.
57%





