Send Help

This survival thriller about two coworkers stranded together after a plane crash won over most critics with its game, physically committed lead performances and a directorial hand that feels newly unleashed after a long stretch of more restrained studio work. Reviewers responded to the gleeful, gross-out energy of the set pieces and to a central pairing whose antagonism carries real charge — praise that clustered consistently enough across outlets to read as genuine consensus rather than a one-off rave.

The complaints cluster just as tightly around structure and tone. Critics flagged a bloated midsection, a first act that leans too hard on clumsy expository dialogue, and supporting characters who add runtime without adding much else. There's also a recurring note that the film can't settle on a single register, sliding between broad comedy, straight survival horror, and revenge drama without fully committing to any one of them — some found that unpredictability part of the fun, others found it diluting.

Where critics genuinely split is on the ending. A number of reviewers felt the final stretch complicates the story's sympathies in a way that lands as bold and morally messy in a good way; others felt it undercuts whatever point the film was building toward, leaving the social commentary muddled rather than sharpened. That disagreement is less about craft than about how much moral ambiguity in a genre film like this a viewer is willing to sit with.