KindredOwl
Create Review

SPLAT!

Music2026
CountryUnited Kingdom · English
QualityProgressiveRockIntenseNostalgic

The review

Deep Purple's twenty-fourth studio album finds the veteran band in unexpectedly vigorous form, and reviewers have largely framed it as a genuine return to form rather than a nostalgia exercise. The playing is tight and muscular, captured live-in-the-studio in a way that gives the record a heavier, more physical presence than much of the band's recent catalog, and the songwriting is consistently praised as some of their strongest in years — energetic, purposeful, and unusually cohesive for a band this many albums into its run.

Where critics diverge is on ambition versus comfort. Several note that the record plays it safe, leaning on well-worn hard-rock and blues-rock vocabulary rather than pushing into new territory, and that the lyrics are serviceable rather than sharp. A minority of listeners go further, arguing the songwriting occasionally feels like an assemblage of the band's signature moves without much underneath — a smaller but pointed complaint that the bulk of reviewers do not share. Pacing is another mild sore point: a few reviewers feel the album rarely lets up enough to breathe between tracks.

Underneath the riffs, the record carries a more reflective streak than its title suggests, built around ideas of ending not as catastrophe but as transformation. Most critics find this thematic undercurrent adds welcome weight without slowing the record down, though a handful feel the concept is gestured at more than fully explored. The overall picture is a band still playing with real conviction, delivering a record most reviewers rank among the stronger entries in their later-era output, even if it stops short of universal, unqualified acclaim.

Who it's for

Longtime Deep Purple and classic hard-rock listeners who want the band's core sound — keyboard-and-guitar interplay, blues-rock grooves, powerhouse vocals — delivered with real muscle rather than nostalgia-tour polish. Fans of veteran rock acts making vital, high-energy late-career records, and listeners drawn to riff-driven rock with an unexpectedly reflective, big-picture lyrical streak running underneath it.

Who it's not for

Listeners hoping for a reinvention or a departure from the band's established sound will find little here that surprises them. Anyone sensitive to dense, relentless arrangements with few slower or quieter moments may find the pacing fatiguing, and listeners who want lyrics with sharp, specific detail rather than broad thematic gestures may come away wanting more.heavy/existential themes (mortality and the end of humanity as a framing concept)

  • MusicThe Confuser (2026)

    The single strongest match: a veteran psych/rock artist confronts mortality with buoyant, hooky arrangements instead of dread, explicitly reframing death as continuity with matter rather than annihilation -- the same transformation-not-destruction thesis and 'bemused acceptance' register SPLAT! builds its closer around.

    92%
  • MusicBring On the Psychics (2026)

    A legacy act well into its career confronting finite time with riff-driven vitality rather than confession, aimed squarely at listeners who already love the band's history -- the same late-career-renewal frame and mortality-through-energy move as SPLAT!, minus the metaphysical resolution.

    68%
  • MusicAurora (2026)

    A veteran rock act leaning hard on its classic-era sonic vocabulary at higher energy, aimed squarely at listeners with existing investment in the band's identity rather than newcomers, with pacing/density flagged as the record's main structural weakness.

    66%
  • MusicExile on Main St. (1972)

    A heritage rock band's sprawling, keyboard-and-guitar-forward record built on live-band physicality and dense, unrelenting momentum over dynamic contrast -- the same structural choice that gives SPLAT! its breathless pacing, though Exile's register leans hedonistic exhaustion rather than metaphysical acceptance.

    60%