KindredOwl
Create Review

What We Do in the Shadows

TV2019
ShowrunnerPaul Simms
CountryUnited States · English
ClassicComedyHorrorMockumentaryFranchise EntryAdult

The review

What We Do in the Shadows is one of the most consistently acclaimed American comedies of its era — a rare TV extension of a beloved film that built its own identity rather than rehashing the original's jokes. Transplanting the mockumentary premise from Wellington to Staten Island, it follows a household of centuries-old vampires who are at once fearsome monsters and petty, squabbling roommates. The engine is the ensemble: every main cast member is a distinct comic creation, from the self-styled conqueror with a fragile ego to the lecherous British dandy, the mercurial Eastern European temptress, the human familiar desperate for validation, and the office-worker energy vampire who quietly became the series' most original invention. Across its entire run the show drew acclaim for the precision of its deadpan performances and for turning dense vampire lore into a bottomless well of sitcom jokes, earning an unusually strong awards record for a half-hour comedy.

The show's signature is its tonal tightrope — mundane domestic comedy (household chores, city council meetings, awkward trips to the mall) delivered with total deadpan commitment through the documentary framing, punctuated by sudden bursts of cartoonish gore. The vampires' complete inability to recognize their own irrelevance drives most episodes. The main critical knock is structural: for long stretches the show is proudly episodic, and in its later seasons some reviewers felt it occasionally coasted on character chemistry, with certain recurring subplots wearing thin and a couple of secondary characters underused. Those dips were relative — even at its most relaxed, the show remained among the funniest things on television — but the seasons varied in ambition, and the bold middle stretch drew the strongest notices.

The deepest consistency is the cast's invention, widely regarded as one of the best comedy ensembles of its generation. The show's animating theme — the absurd gap between what these ancient beings imagine themselves to be and what they actually are — gives it warmth as well as jokes, as immortal conquerors obsess over rent, exes, and being liked. The series also landed its ending: the final season drew some of the franchise's best reviews, and the series finale was praised as a rare, satisfying farewell that refused to betray its characters. When critics disagreed, the dispute was about trajectory — which season counted as the peak and whether the later, smaller-scale installments matched the middle stretch's ambition — not about whether the show was essential viewing.

  • Season 1

    Season 1 (2019): Establishes the Staten Island household and the mockumentary format with immediate confidence, expanding the film's lore into a richer supernatural community. Critics singled out the energy-draining office worker Colin Robinson as the breakout scene-stealer, and even reviews that noted a couple of early episodes were still finding their footing agreed the ensemble clicked fast.

  • Season 2

    Season 2 (2020): Widely regarded as an improvement on a strong debut, sharpening the show's satirical bite by giving the human familiar Guillermo a far more central and increasingly formidable role. The season's standalone episodes were praised for expanding the show's supernatural horizons and produced several of the series' most celebrated half-hours.

  • Season 3

    Season 3 (2021): The creative peak by most critical accounts, earning the show's strongest reviews of its run. Its distinction was structural boldness — a willingness to destabilize the household's status quo in ways that reordered the series' dynamics and made its future genuinely unpredictable.

  • Season 4

    Season 4 (2022): A confident high-concept reset year that introduced a bizarre new domestic situation and a string of new ambitions while the ensemble spent much of the season apart. Consensus held that it didn't quite match the preceding peak but that it remained among the funniest shows on television, buoyed by standout episodes and typically superb performances.

  • Season 5

    Season 5 (2023): A deliberate return to smaller, more episodic stakes after two years of upheaval. Reviewers found it a modest step down in ambition — a couple of recurring subplots wore thin and one new regular was underused — but the core cast's chemistry kept it consistently funny even at lower wattage.

  • Season 6

    Season 6 (2024): The consciously constructed final season, which wound the show down before the premise could grow stale. Several episodes ranked with the series' best, and the series finale was widely praised as a satisfying, character-true landing — a rare feat for a long-running comedy.

Who it's for

Fans of mockumentary sitcoms in the *Office*/*Parks and Recreation*/*Spinal Tap* lineage. Taika Waititi and Jemaine Clement devotees who want more of that deadpan, absurdist sensibility. Viewers who like their comedy macabre and their horror genuinely funny — the genuine vampire lore and creature details reward genre fans. Audiences who prize quotable, character-driven ensemble comedy and enjoy episodes that are more about hanging out with beloved characters than advancing a plot.

Who it's not for

Viewers who are squeamish about blood and gore even when played for laughs. Those who find the mockumentary format tired, or who need comedies to have forward narrative momentum. People who prefer their vampires (and horror generally) treated with solemnity. Anyone who dislikes comedy built on characters being petty, incompetent, and mutually exasperating — the humor is almost entirely at the characters' expense, and it's relentless.graphic violence · blood and gore · sexual content · strong language · disturbing imagery

  • TVAdventure Time (2010)

    Both shows are comedic fantasy with a deceptive lightness that masks deep melancholy. They share a found-family dynamic among odd, supernatural characters who bicker and bond over mundane problems, and both embrace their characters' permanent flaws rather than resolving them. The tonal whiplash between silly and devastating is a direct parallel.

    90%
  • FilmThe Wizard of Oz (1939)

    Both involve misfits who form a bond while discovering that apparent magic is really ordinary human stagecraft. The vampires' delusions of grandeur echo the Wizard's hollow authority, and each work celebrates that the real 'powers' were within all along. Whimsy and genuine menace coexist in both, and the emphasis on found companionship and self-worth carries across.

    70%
  • MusicNATURE IS HEALING (2026)

    This album shares the show's signature blend of silly and sincere, using a campy alter ego to explore big feelings without fully committing to earnestness. Both play with performance of identity and genre expectations, and the album's ironic-sincere double register matches the deadpan absurdity of the mockumentary comedy.

    65%
  • BookCool Machine (2026)

    Both center on characters leading double lives between a mundane reality and a 'criminal' or supernatural underworld, exploring the cost of that duality and the need for belonging. The novel is serious in tone, but the thematic tension between the self and the persona, and a group with its own codes and hierarchy, offers a meaningful point of connection for fans of the show's themes.

    50%